top of page

A Dual Aesthetic Perspective on Nonprofit Marketing: A Monetary Donation Study

This research paper explores how different visual aesthetics in nonprofit ads impact empathy and donation intent. Using AI-generated images and survey data from 205 participants, I tested emotional and material cues across three conditions. The findings suggest that hopeful visuals with visible need can drive stronger donor engagement than purely sad or happy imagery.

Project Type

Research Seminar Paper

Date

Jan-May 2025

Course

Marketing Communication for the Greater Good: To Inspire, Choose, and Be Responsible | Semester 8

Professor

Dr. Kavitha Iyer

unnamed (2).jpg

What Sparked This?

Can a smile in the middle of hardship inspire more giving than sadness alone?

​

This question sat at the heart of my seminar paper, which explored the psychological and emotional triggers behind donation intent. I was always drawn to visual communication and its ability to move people. After considering several topic ideas, like sustainability messaging and shock advertising used in health campaigns (e.g., anti-smoking packaging), I was intrigued by how aesthetics and empathy intertwine in nonprofit appeals. With guidance from my professor, I developed a study over the course of 4 months that asked: Which type of image evokes more empathy and donation: pleasing, distressing or a combination?

​

Research Gap: 
Existing literature seems to focus on the role of pleasing and distressing images (separately) on empathy formation and pro social behaviour. There remains limited offerings about the impact of the combination of both pleasing and distressing images in creating empathy and subsequent monetary donation behaviour through a single visual.


This is the gap that this paper tried to address so that NPOs (Non-Profit Organisations) can be better informed about their visual communication strategies for the greater good.

Research Design & Study

I designed a three-image visual experiment featuring AI-generated photos of the same girl in:

  • Image 1: Sad expression, torn clothes

  • Image 2: Happy expression, clean clothes

  • Image 3: Happy expression, torn clothes (a blend of emotional and material cues)

​​

The aim was to examine how image valence (pleasant/unpleasant) influenced both empathy levels and donation intent in participants.

Methodology & Analysis

Participants: 205

​

Primary Tool: Google Forms survey

​

Measurement Instruments: 

  • Standard empathy and donation intent scales from existing literature

  • My own extended model based on the Stimulus-Organism-Response (S-O-R) framework

​

Statistical Tests Used (SPSS):

  • ANOVA to test variance across image conditions

  • Pearson’s correlation to explore empathy-donation links

  • Regression analysis to understand predictive relationships

 

My findings, presented in detail with graphs and statistical tables, were included in the discussion section, along with clear breakdowns of key implications.

Additional Components Included

  • Clear articulation of research implications, including strategies for nonprofits to craft emotionally effective campaigns

  • Outline of research limitations and future scope (e.g., testing videos, other demographics)

  • Full appendix with stimulus visuals, questionnaire, and SPSS outputs

Key Takeaways

  • A one-size-fits-all design strategy doesn’t work in the nonprofit space

  • Donor segmentation based on cognitive preferences (rational vs. emotional processors) is essential

  • Visual storytelling is not just about aesthetics—it's about conveying authentic impact without compromising clarity

bottom of page